An incident in Colorado raises questions about the use of surveillance technologies and the presumption of infallibility of the evidence collected. ## Accusation and Refusal of Evidence Christina Elser was accused of theft based on images from Flock cameras, automated license plate reader systems. Despite providing footage showing her presence elsewhere at the time of the alleged theft, a police officer flatly refused to examine the evidence, insisting on pursuing legal action. ## Escalation and Reversal The situation escalated into a heated argument, with the officer stubbornly refusing to consider any exculpatory evidence. Only later, after the intervention of the police chief and the presentation of further video evidence, were the charges dropped. The officer involved underwent additional training. ## Reflections on Surveillance The experience led Elser to reconsider her position on surveillance, which she had previously favored. She expressed concern about the over-reliance on such technologies and the potential for miscarriages of justice, even in the absence of bad intentions. This case highlights the risks of blind faith in surveillance systems and the need for a more balanced and critical approach.